R v Pommell [1995] 2 Cr App R 607 (CA) FACTS: Pommell was found with a loaded submachine gun and charged with the unlawful possession of a firearm. He argued that he had taken the weapon from a friend in order to prevent the friend from committing a murder, as he had threatened to do. HELD: The Court of Appeal held that the defence of duress of circumstances was available for offences beyond traffic offences. The defence would be available where the accused [...]and he had (objectively) acted reasonably and proportionately with respect to the threat.
Answer
reasonably believed that his action was necessary to prevent death or serious personal injury to himself or another
Tags
#crime #defences #law
Question
R v Pommell [1995] 2 Cr App R 607 (CA) FACTS: Pommell was found with a loaded submachine gun and charged with the unlawful possession of a firearm. He argued that he had taken the weapon from a friend in order to prevent the friend from committing a murder, as he had threatened to do. HELD: The Court of Appeal held that the defence of duress of circumstances was available for offences beyond traffic offences. The defence would be available where the accused [...]and he had (objectively) acted reasonably and proportionately with respect to the threat.
Answer
?
Tags
#crime #defences #law
Question
R v Pommell [1995] 2 Cr App R 607 (CA) FACTS: Pommell was found with a loaded submachine gun and charged with the unlawful possession of a firearm. He argued that he had taken the weapon from a friend in order to prevent the friend from committing a murder, as he had threatened to do. HELD: The Court of Appeal held that the defence of duress of circumstances was available for offences beyond traffic offences. The defence would be available where the accused [...]and he had (objectively) acted reasonably and proportionately with respect to the threat.
Answer
reasonably believed that his action was necessary to prevent death or serious personal injury to himself or another
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it the friend from committing a murder, as he had threatened to do. HELD: The Court of Appeal held that the defence of duress of circumstances was available for offences beyond traffic offences. The defence would be available where the accused <span>reasonably believed that his action was necessary to prevent death or serious personal injury to himself or another and he had (objectively) acted reasonably and proportionately with respect to the threat. <span><body><html>
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.