Horseplay
In R v Jones (1986) 83 Cr App R 375, some boys at a youth club tossed two other boys into the air, resulting in one suffering a ruptured spleen and the other a broken arm. The Court of Appeal held that they ought to be able to raise the issue of consent as boys have always indulged in rough and undisciplined play among themselves.
In [ case ], drunken RAF officers were setting fire to one another's fire- resistant suits, treating it as a joke. Later they set fire to the victim’s suit and he was severely burned. The Court Martial Appeal Court quashed the conviction, relying on Jones.
In R v Richardson and Irwin [1999] I Cr App R 392, the defendants seized their friend whom they claimed they believed was consenting and held him over a balcony. They dropped him and he broke several bones. Their conviction was quashed as the trial judge had not directed the jury to consider consent.
Answer
R v Aitken [1992] 1WLR 1006
Tags
#crime #defences #law
Question
Horseplay
In R v Jones (1986) 83 Cr App R 375, some boys at a youth club tossed two other boys into the air, resulting in one suffering a ruptured spleen and the other a broken arm. The Court of Appeal held that they ought to be able to raise the issue of consent as boys have always indulged in rough and undisciplined play among themselves.
In [ case ], drunken RAF officers were setting fire to one another's fire- resistant suits, treating it as a joke. Later they set fire to the victim’s suit and he was severely burned. The Court Martial Appeal Court quashed the conviction, relying on Jones.
In R v Richardson and Irwin [1999] I Cr App R 392, the defendants seized their friend whom they claimed they believed was consenting and held him over a balcony. They dropped him and he broke several bones. Their conviction was quashed as the trial judge had not directed the jury to consider consent.
Answer
?
Tags
#crime #defences #law
Question
Horseplay
In R v Jones (1986) 83 Cr App R 375, some boys at a youth club tossed two other boys into the air, resulting in one suffering a ruptured spleen and the other a broken arm. The Court of Appeal held that they ought to be able to raise the issue of consent as boys have always indulged in rough and undisciplined play among themselves.
In [ case ], drunken RAF officers were setting fire to one another's fire- resistant suits, treating it as a joke. Later they set fire to the victim’s suit and he was severely burned. The Court Martial Appeal Court quashed the conviction, relying on Jones.
In R v Richardson and Irwin [1999] I Cr App R 392, the defendants seized their friend whom they claimed they believed was consenting and held him over a balcony. They dropped him and he broke several bones. Their conviction was quashed as the trial judge had not directed the jury to consider consent.
Answer
R v Aitken [1992] 1WLR 1006
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it resulting in one suffering a ruptured spleen and the other a broken arm. The Court of Appeal held that they ought to be able to raise the issue of consent as boys have always indulged in rough and undisciplined play among themselves.
In <span>R v Aitken [1992] 1WLR 1006, drunken RAF officers were setting fire to one another's fire- resistant suits, treating it as a joke. Later they set fire to the victim’s suit and he was severely burned. The Court Mar
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.