[ case ]HELD: The Court of Appeal held that R v Clarence was no longer authoritative for the suggestion that consensual sexual intercourse, of itself, was to be regarded as consent to the risk of consequent disease, especially where the defendant concealed the fact that he was infected.
Answer
R v Dica [2004] QB 1257
Tags
#crime #defences #law
Question
[ case ]HELD: The Court of Appeal held that R v Clarence was no longer authoritative for the suggestion that consensual sexual intercourse, of itself, was to be regarded as consent to the risk of consequent disease, especially where the defendant concealed the fact that he was infected.
Answer
?
Tags
#crime #defences #law
Question
[ case ]HELD: The Court of Appeal held that R v Clarence was no longer authoritative for the suggestion that consensual sexual intercourse, of itself, was to be regarded as consent to the risk of consequent disease, especially where the defendant concealed the fact that he was infected.
Answer
R v Dica [2004] QB 1257
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it R v Dica [2004] QB 1257 HELD: The Court of Appeal held that R v Clarence was no longer authoritative for the suggestion that consensual sexual intercourse, of itself, was to be regarded as consent to the risk
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.