R v Dica [2004] QB 1257 HELD: The Court of Appeal held that R v Clarence was no longer authoritative for the suggestion that consensual sexual intercourse, of itself, was to be regarded as consent to the risk of consequent disease, especially where the defendant [...].
Answer
concealed the fact that he was infected
Tags
#crime #defences #law
Question
R v Dica [2004] QB 1257 HELD: The Court of Appeal held that R v Clarence was no longer authoritative for the suggestion that consensual sexual intercourse, of itself, was to be regarded as consent to the risk of consequent disease, especially where the defendant [...].
Answer
?
Tags
#crime #defences #law
Question
R v Dica [2004] QB 1257 HELD: The Court of Appeal held that R v Clarence was no longer authoritative for the suggestion that consensual sexual intercourse, of itself, was to be regarded as consent to the risk of consequent disease, especially where the defendant [...].
Answer
concealed the fact that he was infected
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it HELD: The Court of Appeal held that R v Clarence was no longer authoritative for the suggestion that consensual sexual intercourse, of itself, was to be regarded as consent to the risk of consequent disease, especially where the defendant <span>concealed the fact that he was infected.<span><body><html>
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.