In [ case ], Lord Lane CJ stated that the accused would be entitled to the defence of self-defence if:
'... his object was to protect himself or his family or his property against imminent apprehended attack and to do so by means which he believed were no more than reasonably necessary to meet the force used by the attackers.'
Answer
A-G's Reference (No 2 of 1983) [1984] QB 456 (CA)
Tags
#crime #defences #law
Question
In [ case ], Lord Lane CJ stated that the accused would be entitled to the defence of self-defence if:
'... his object was to protect himself or his family or his property against imminent apprehended attack and to do so by means which he believed were no more than reasonably necessary to meet the force used by the attackers.'
Answer
?
Tags
#crime #defences #law
Question
In [ case ], Lord Lane CJ stated that the accused would be entitled to the defence of self-defence if:
'... his object was to protect himself or his family or his property against imminent apprehended attack and to do so by means which he believed were no more than reasonably necessary to meet the force used by the attackers.'
Answer
A-G's Reference (No 2 of 1983) [1984] QB 456 (CA)
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it In A-G's Reference (No 2 of 1983) [1984] QB 456 (CA), Lord Lane CJ stated that the accused would be entitled to the defence of self-defence if:
'... his object was to protect himself or his family or his property against immi
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.