Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.



Tags
#crime #defences #law
Question
Similarly, the defence of necessity was not allowed to a homeless person in a civil case involving trespass to unoccupied housing: [ case ]:

'If hunger were once allowed to be an excuse for stealing, it would open a way through which all kinds of disorder and lawlessness would pass. So here. If homelessness were once admitted as a defence to trespass no one's house would be safe. Necessity could open a door which no man could shut. So the courts must, for the sake of law and order, take a firm stand. They must refuse to admit the pleas of necessity to the hungry and the homeless; and trust that their distress will be relieved by the charitable and the good.' (Per Lord Denning.)

Answer
London Borough of Southwark v Williams [1971] Ch 734 (CA)

Tags
#crime #defences #law
Question
Similarly, the defence of necessity was not allowed to a homeless person in a civil case involving trespass to unoccupied housing: [ case ]:

'If hunger were once allowed to be an excuse for stealing, it would open a way through which all kinds of disorder and lawlessness would pass. So here. If homelessness were once admitted as a defence to trespass no one's house would be safe. Necessity could open a door which no man could shut. So the courts must, for the sake of law and order, take a firm stand. They must refuse to admit the pleas of necessity to the hungry and the homeless; and trust that their distress will be relieved by the charitable and the good.' (Per Lord Denning.)

Answer
?

Tags
#crime #defences #law
Question
Similarly, the defence of necessity was not allowed to a homeless person in a civil case involving trespass to unoccupied housing: [ case ]:

'If hunger were once allowed to be an excuse for stealing, it would open a way through which all kinds of disorder and lawlessness would pass. So here. If homelessness were once admitted as a defence to trespass no one's house would be safe. Necessity could open a door which no man could shut. So the courts must, for the sake of law and order, take a firm stand. They must refuse to admit the pleas of necessity to the hungry and the homeless; and trust that their distress will be relieved by the charitable and the good.' (Per Lord Denning.)

Answer
London Borough of Southwark v Williams [1971] Ch 734 (CA)
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"

Parent (intermediate) annotation

Open it
Similarly, the defence of necessity was not allowed to a homeless person in a civil case involving trespass to unoccupied housing: London Borough of Southwark v Williams [1971] Ch 734 (CA): 'If hunger were once allowed to be an excuse for stealing, it would open a way through which all kinds of disorder and lawlessness would pass. So here. If homelessness wer

Original toplevel document (pdf)

cannot see any pdfs

Summary

statusnot learnedmeasured difficulty37% [default]last interval [days]               
repetition number in this series0memorised on               scheduled repetition               
scheduled repetition interval               last repetition or drill

Details

No repetitions


Discussion

Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.