Tattooing/Personal Adornment
Tattooing and body piercing form another exception. [ case ] FACTS: The defendant used a hot knife to brand his initials onto the buttocks of his wife, at her request. He argued consent to a charge under the OAPA 1861, s 47, and was successful. HELD: The Court of Appeal held that there was no logical difference between this type of branding, tattooing, body piercing, and similar personal adornments, which is a lawful activity. This case forms an interesting contrast to the decision and dicta in R v Brown
Answer
R v Wilson [1997] QB 47 (CA)
Tags
#crime #defences #law
Question
Tattooing/Personal Adornment
Tattooing and body piercing form another exception. [ case ] FACTS: The defendant used a hot knife to brand his initials onto the buttocks of his wife, at her request. He argued consent to a charge under the OAPA 1861, s 47, and was successful. HELD: The Court of Appeal held that there was no logical difference between this type of branding, tattooing, body piercing, and similar personal adornments, which is a lawful activity. This case forms an interesting contrast to the decision and dicta in R v Brown
Answer
?
Tags
#crime #defences #law
Question
Tattooing/Personal Adornment
Tattooing and body piercing form another exception. [ case ] FACTS: The defendant used a hot knife to brand his initials onto the buttocks of his wife, at her request. He argued consent to a charge under the OAPA 1861, s 47, and was successful. HELD: The Court of Appeal held that there was no logical difference between this type of branding, tattooing, body piercing, and similar personal adornments, which is a lawful activity. This case forms an interesting contrast to the decision and dicta in R v Brown
Answer
R v Wilson [1997] QB 47 (CA)
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it Tattooing/Personal Adornment
Tattooing and body piercing form another exception.
R v Wilson [1997] QB 47 (CA) FACTS: The defendant used a hot knife to brand his initials onto the buttocks of his wife, at her request. He argued consent to a charge under the OAPA 1861, s 47, and was successful. HE
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.