Until 1998, there was a similar presumption for children aged between 10 and 14, although this presumption was rebuttable by the prosecution. The presumption was abolished by the Crime and Disorder Act 1998, s 34. The Court of Appeal has recently decided in [ case ]that the defence of doli incapax can never apply to children over ten.
Answer
R v T [2008] EWCA Crim 815
Tags
#crime #defences #law
Question
Until 1998, there was a similar presumption for children aged between 10 and 14, although this presumption was rebuttable by the prosecution. The presumption was abolished by the Crime and Disorder Act 1998, s 34. The Court of Appeal has recently decided in [ case ]that the defence of doli incapax can never apply to children over ten.
Answer
?
Tags
#crime #defences #law
Question
Until 1998, there was a similar presumption for children aged between 10 and 14, although this presumption was rebuttable by the prosecution. The presumption was abolished by the Crime and Disorder Act 1998, s 34. The Court of Appeal has recently decided in [ case ]that the defence of doli incapax can never apply to children over ten.
Answer
R v T [2008] EWCA Crim 815
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it was a similar presumption for children aged between 10 and 14, although this presumption was rebuttable by the prosecution. The presumption was abolished by the Crime and Disorder Act 1998, s 34. The Court of Appeal has recently decided in <span>R v T [2008] EWCA Crim 815 that the defence of doli incapax can never apply to children over ten.<span><body><html>
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.