Until 1998, there was a similar presumption for children aged between 10 and 14, although this presumption was rebuttable by the prosecution. The presumption was abolished by the Crime and Disorder Act 1998, s 34. The Court of Appeal has recently decided in R v T [2008] EWCA Crim 815 that the defence of doli incapax can [...].
Answer
never apply to children over ten
Tags
#crime #defences #law
Question
Until 1998, there was a similar presumption for children aged between 10 and 14, although this presumption was rebuttable by the prosecution. The presumption was abolished by the Crime and Disorder Act 1998, s 34. The Court of Appeal has recently decided in R v T [2008] EWCA Crim 815 that the defence of doli incapax can [...].
Answer
?
Tags
#crime #defences #law
Question
Until 1998, there was a similar presumption for children aged between 10 and 14, although this presumption was rebuttable by the prosecution. The presumption was abolished by the Crime and Disorder Act 1998, s 34. The Court of Appeal has recently decided in R v T [2008] EWCA Crim 815 that the defence of doli incapax can [...].
Answer
never apply to children over ten
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it lthough this presumption was rebuttable by the prosecution. The presumption was abolished by the Crime and Disorder Act 1998, s 34. The Court of Appeal has recently decided in R v T [2008] EWCA Crim 815 that the defence of doli incapax can <span>never apply to children over ten.<span><body><html>
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.