In [ case ], the Privy Council held that duress was not available to a principal offender on a charge of murder. In R v Howe & Others [1987] AC 417 (HL), the House of Lords confirmed the views of the Privy Council in Abbott that duress is not available to a person charged with murder as a principal offender. The House of Lords also held that duress was not available to a person charged as an accessory to murder. In R v Gotts [1992] 2 AC 412 (HL), the House of Lords held that duress is not available on a charge of attempted murder.
Answer
Abbott v R [1977] AC 755 (PC)
Tags
#crime #defences #law
Question
In [ case ], the Privy Council held that duress was not available to a principal offender on a charge of murder. In R v Howe & Others [1987] AC 417 (HL), the House of Lords confirmed the views of the Privy Council in Abbott that duress is not available to a person charged with murder as a principal offender. The House of Lords also held that duress was not available to a person charged as an accessory to murder. In R v Gotts [1992] 2 AC 412 (HL), the House of Lords held that duress is not available on a charge of attempted murder.
Answer
?
Tags
#crime #defences #law
Question
In [ case ], the Privy Council held that duress was not available to a principal offender on a charge of murder. In R v Howe & Others [1987] AC 417 (HL), the House of Lords confirmed the views of the Privy Council in Abbott that duress is not available to a person charged with murder as a principal offender. The House of Lords also held that duress was not available to a person charged as an accessory to murder. In R v Gotts [1992] 2 AC 412 (HL), the House of Lords held that duress is not available on a charge of attempted murder.
Answer
Abbott v R [1977] AC 755 (PC)
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it In Abbott v R [1977] AC 755 (PC), the Privy Council held that duress was not available to a principal offender on a charge of murder. In R v Howe & Others [1987] AC 417 (HL), the House of Lords confirmed the vi
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.