Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.


  • Presentation
  • Question
  • Answer

Tags
#crime #defences #law
Question
Necessity is sometimes described as the doctrine of the lesser of two evils: the defendant was forced to act in the way he did because a failure to act would have resulted in a greater danger arising. That danger may result from a threat from another, or some other outside factor. For many years, it was thought that the defence of necessity did not exist. The case of [ case ], makes it clear that necessity is not a defence to murder.
Answer
R v Dudley & Stevens (1884) 14 QBD 273

Tags
#crime #defences #law
Question
Necessity is sometimes described as the doctrine of the lesser of two evils: the defendant was forced to act in the way he did because a failure to act would have resulted in a greater danger arising. That danger may result from a threat from another, or some other outside factor. For many years, it was thought that the defence of necessity did not exist. The case of [ case ], makes it clear that necessity is not a defence to murder.
Answer
?

Tags
#crime #defences #law
Question
Necessity is sometimes described as the doctrine of the lesser of two evils: the defendant was forced to act in the way he did because a failure to act would have resulted in a greater danger arising. That danger may result from a threat from another, or some other outside factor. For many years, it was thought that the defence of necessity did not exist. The case of [ case ], makes it clear that necessity is not a defence to murder.
Answer
R v Dudley & Stevens (1884) 14 QBD 273
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"

Parent (intermediate) annotation

Open it
ause a failure to act would have resulted in a greater danger arising. That danger may result from a threat from another, or some other outside factor. For many years, it was thought that the defence of necessity did not exist. The case of <span>R v Dudley & Stevens (1884) 14 QBD 273, makes it clear that necessity is not a defence to murder.<span><body><html>

Original toplevel document (pdf)

cannot see any pdfs

Summary

statusnot learnedmeasured difficulty37% [default]last interval [days]               
repetition number in this series0memorised on               scheduled repetition               
scheduled repetition interval               last repetition or drill

Details

No repetitions

Discussion

Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.