Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.



Tags
#crime #defences #law
Question
An argument for a defence of necessity for a fireman responding to an emergency call was also rejected in relation to a charge of driving through a red light: [ case ]:

'I put this illustration: a driver of a fire engine with ladders approaches the traffic lights. He sees 200 yards down the road a blazing house with a man at an upstairs window in extreme peril. The road is clear in all directions. At that moment the lights turn red. Is the driver to wait for sixty seconds, or more, for the lights to turn green? If the driver waits for that time, the man's life will be lost. I suggested to both counsel that the driver might be excused in crossing the lights to save the man. He might have the defence of necessity. Both counsel denied it. They would not allow him any defence in law. The circumstances went to mitigation they said, and did not take away his guilt. If counsel are correct – and I think they are – nevertheless such a man should not be prosecuted, he should be congratulated.' (Per Lord Denning.)

Answer
Buckoke v GLC [1971] Ch 655 (CA)

Tags
#crime #defences #law
Question
An argument for a defence of necessity for a fireman responding to an emergency call was also rejected in relation to a charge of driving through a red light: [ case ]:

'I put this illustration: a driver of a fire engine with ladders approaches the traffic lights. He sees 200 yards down the road a blazing house with a man at an upstairs window in extreme peril. The road is clear in all directions. At that moment the lights turn red. Is the driver to wait for sixty seconds, or more, for the lights to turn green? If the driver waits for that time, the man's life will be lost. I suggested to both counsel that the driver might be excused in crossing the lights to save the man. He might have the defence of necessity. Both counsel denied it. They would not allow him any defence in law. The circumstances went to mitigation they said, and did not take away his guilt. If counsel are correct – and I think they are – nevertheless such a man should not be prosecuted, he should be congratulated.' (Per Lord Denning.)

Answer
?

Tags
#crime #defences #law
Question
An argument for a defence of necessity for a fireman responding to an emergency call was also rejected in relation to a charge of driving through a red light: [ case ]:

'I put this illustration: a driver of a fire engine with ladders approaches the traffic lights. He sees 200 yards down the road a blazing house with a man at an upstairs window in extreme peril. The road is clear in all directions. At that moment the lights turn red. Is the driver to wait for sixty seconds, or more, for the lights to turn green? If the driver waits for that time, the man's life will be lost. I suggested to both counsel that the driver might be excused in crossing the lights to save the man. He might have the defence of necessity. Both counsel denied it. They would not allow him any defence in law. The circumstances went to mitigation they said, and did not take away his guilt. If counsel are correct – and I think they are – nevertheless such a man should not be prosecuted, he should be congratulated.' (Per Lord Denning.)

Answer
Buckoke v GLC [1971] Ch 655 (CA)
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"

Parent (intermediate) annotation

Open it
An argument for a defence of necessity for a fireman responding to an emergency call was also rejected in relation to a charge of driving through a red light: Buckoke v GLC [1971] Ch 655 (CA): 'I put this illustration: a driver of a fire engine with ladders approaches the traffic lights. He sees 200 yards down the road a blazing house with a man at an upstairs w

Original toplevel document (pdf)

cannot see any pdfs

Summary

statusnot learnedmeasured difficulty37% [default]last interval [days]               
repetition number in this series0memorised on               scheduled repetition               
scheduled repetition interval               last repetition or drill

Details

No repetitions


Discussion

Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.