The interesting development of [ who ]' ideas in Thoburn, developed by the Supreme Court in the HS2 case, centres on the comparative importance of central constitutional principles and statutes. Arguably the matter is more complex than Laws suggested with his differentiation between 'constitutional' and 'ordinary' statutes. The Supreme Court's rejection of the argument that EU law should trump the rather more established constitutional tenet contained in the Bill of Rights 1689, article 9 – that freedom of speech and proceedings in Parliament ought not to be 'impeached' in any court of law – suggests some constitutional statutes or norms may be considered more important than others.
Answer
Laws
Tags
#constitution #law #public
Question
The interesting development of [ who ]' ideas in Thoburn, developed by the Supreme Court in the HS2 case, centres on the comparative importance of central constitutional principles and statutes. Arguably the matter is more complex than Laws suggested with his differentiation between 'constitutional' and 'ordinary' statutes. The Supreme Court's rejection of the argument that EU law should trump the rather more established constitutional tenet contained in the Bill of Rights 1689, article 9 – that freedom of speech and proceedings in Parliament ought not to be 'impeached' in any court of law – suggests some constitutional statutes or norms may be considered more important than others.
Answer
?
Tags
#constitution #law #public
Question
The interesting development of [ who ]' ideas in Thoburn, developed by the Supreme Court in the HS2 case, centres on the comparative importance of central constitutional principles and statutes. Arguably the matter is more complex than Laws suggested with his differentiation between 'constitutional' and 'ordinary' statutes. The Supreme Court's rejection of the argument that EU law should trump the rather more established constitutional tenet contained in the Bill of Rights 1689, article 9 – that freedom of speech and proceedings in Parliament ought not to be 'impeached' in any court of law – suggests some constitutional statutes or norms may be considered more important than others.
Answer
Laws
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it The interesting development of Laws' ideas in Thoburn, developed by the Supreme Court in the HS2 case, centres on the comparative importance of central constitutional principles and statutes. Arguably the matter is more
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.