Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.



Tags
#constitution #law #public
Question
The interesting development of Laws' ideas in Thoburn, developed by the Supreme Court in the HS2 case, centres on the comparative importance of central constitutional principles and statutes. Arguably the matter is more complex than Laws suggested with his differentiation between [...] statutes. The Supreme Court's rejection of the argument that EU law should trump the rather more established constitutional tenet contained in the Bill of Rights 1689, article 9 – that freedom of speech and proceedings in Parliament ought not to be 'impeached' in any court of law – suggests some constitutional statutes or norms may be considered more important than others.
Answer
'constitutional' and 'ordinary'

Tags
#constitution #law #public
Question
The interesting development of Laws' ideas in Thoburn, developed by the Supreme Court in the HS2 case, centres on the comparative importance of central constitutional principles and statutes. Arguably the matter is more complex than Laws suggested with his differentiation between [...] statutes. The Supreme Court's rejection of the argument that EU law should trump the rather more established constitutional tenet contained in the Bill of Rights 1689, article 9 – that freedom of speech and proceedings in Parliament ought not to be 'impeached' in any court of law – suggests some constitutional statutes or norms may be considered more important than others.
Answer
?

Tags
#constitution #law #public
Question
The interesting development of Laws' ideas in Thoburn, developed by the Supreme Court in the HS2 case, centres on the comparative importance of central constitutional principles and statutes. Arguably the matter is more complex than Laws suggested with his differentiation between [...] statutes. The Supreme Court's rejection of the argument that EU law should trump the rather more established constitutional tenet contained in the Bill of Rights 1689, article 9 – that freedom of speech and proceedings in Parliament ought not to be 'impeached' in any court of law – suggests some constitutional statutes or norms may be considered more important than others.
Answer
'constitutional' and 'ordinary'
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"

Parent (intermediate) annotation

Open it
s in Thoburn, developed by the Supreme Court in the HS2 case, centres on the comparative importance of central constitutional principles and statutes. Arguably the matter is more complex than Laws suggested with his differentiation between <span>'constitutional' and 'ordinary' statutes. The Supreme Court's rejection of the argument that EU law should trump the rather more established constitutional tenet contained in the Bill of Rights 1689, article 9 – that

Original toplevel document (pdf)

cannot see any pdfs

Summary

statusnot learnedmeasured difficulty37% [default]last interval [days]               
repetition number in this series0memorised on               scheduled repetition               
scheduled repetition interval               last repetition or drill

Details

No repetitions


Discussion

Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.