Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.



Tags
#equity #law #tracing
Question
Because these actions are personal and not proprietary, the defendant is still liable to repay the value of the property they received even if they no longer have it (or has mixed it with their own): [ cases (2) ].
Answer
Agip (Africa) Ltd v Jackson and Lipkin Gorman v Karpnale Ltd [1991] 2 AC 548

Tags
#equity #law #tracing
Question
Because these actions are personal and not proprietary, the defendant is still liable to repay the value of the property they received even if they no longer have it (or has mixed it with their own): [ cases (2) ].
Answer
?

Tags
#equity #law #tracing
Question
Because these actions are personal and not proprietary, the defendant is still liable to repay the value of the property they received even if they no longer have it (or has mixed it with their own): [ cases (2) ].
Answer
Agip (Africa) Ltd v Jackson and Lipkin Gorman v Karpnale Ltd [1991] 2 AC 548
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"

Parent (intermediate) annotation

Open it
Because these actions are personal and not proprietary, the defendant is still liable to repay the value of the property they received even if they no longer have it (or has mixed it with their own): Agip (Africa) Ltd v Jackson and Lipkin Gorman v Karpnale Ltd [1991] 2 AC 548.

Original toplevel document (pdf)

cannot see any pdfs

Summary

statusnot learnedmeasured difficulty37% [default]last interval [days]               
repetition number in this series0memorised on               scheduled repetition               
scheduled repetition interval               last repetition or drill

Details

No repetitions


Discussion

Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.