Because these actions are personal and not proprietary, the defendant is still liable to repay the value of the property they received even if they no longer have it (or has mixed it with their own): [ cases (2) ].
Answer
Agip (Africa) Ltd v Jackson and Lipkin Gorman v Karpnale Ltd [1991] 2 AC 548
Tags
#equity #law #tracing
Question
Because these actions are personal and not proprietary, the defendant is still liable to repay the value of the property they received even if they no longer have it (or has mixed it with their own): [ cases (2) ].
Answer
?
Tags
#equity #law #tracing
Question
Because these actions are personal and not proprietary, the defendant is still liable to repay the value of the property they received even if they no longer have it (or has mixed it with their own): [ cases (2) ].
Answer
Agip (Africa) Ltd v Jackson and Lipkin Gorman v Karpnale Ltd [1991] 2 AC 548
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it Because these actions are personal and not proprietary, the defendant is still liable to repay the value of the property they received even if they no longer have it (or has mixed it with their own): Agip (Africa) Ltd v Jackson and Lipkin Gorman v Karpnale Ltd [1991] 2 AC 548.
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.