Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.



Tags
#equity #law #tracing
Question
The remedy is not confined to claims between trustee and beneficiary, but to other fiduciaries, e.g. that of solicitor and client [ case ] and accountant and employer in Agip v Jackson (above).
Answer
Re Hallett’s Estate (1880) 13 ChD 696

Tags
#equity #law #tracing
Question
The remedy is not confined to claims between trustee and beneficiary, but to other fiduciaries, e.g. that of solicitor and client [ case ] and accountant and employer in Agip v Jackson (above).
Answer
?

Tags
#equity #law #tracing
Question
The remedy is not confined to claims between trustee and beneficiary, but to other fiduciaries, e.g. that of solicitor and client [ case ] and accountant and employer in Agip v Jackson (above).
Answer
Re Hallett’s Estate (1880) 13 ChD 696
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"

Parent (intermediate) annotation

Open it
The remedy is not confined to claims between trustee and beneficiary, but to other fiduciaries, e.g. that of solicitor and client Re Hallett’s Estate (1880) 13 ChD 696 and accountant and employer in Agip v Jackson (above).

Original toplevel document (pdf)

cannot see any pdfs

Summary

statusnot learnedmeasured difficulty37% [default]last interval [days]               
repetition number in this series0memorised on               scheduled repetition               
scheduled repetition interval               last repetition or drill

Details

No repetitions


Discussion

Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.