the Court of Appeal in [ statute ]refused to find that a right to use a metal staircase constituted ‘actual occupation’, but explicitly chose not to offer any comment as to whether the exercise of other forms of easement could ever comprise ‘occupation’ for the purpose of an overriding interest under para 2.
Answer
Chaudhary v Yavuz [2011] EWCA Civ 1314
Tags
#easements #land #law
Question
the Court of Appeal in [ statute ]refused to find that a right to use a metal staircase constituted ‘actual occupation’, but explicitly chose not to offer any comment as to whether the exercise of other forms of easement could ever comprise ‘occupation’ for the purpose of an overriding interest under para 2.
Answer
?
Tags
#easements #land #law
Question
the Court of Appeal in [ statute ]refused to find that a right to use a metal staircase constituted ‘actual occupation’, but explicitly chose not to offer any comment as to whether the exercise of other forms of easement could ever comprise ‘occupation’ for the purpose of an overriding interest under para 2.
Answer
Chaudhary v Yavuz [2011] EWCA Civ 1314
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it the Court of Appeal in Chaudhary v Yavuz [2011] EWCA Civ 1314 refused to find that a right to use a metal staircase constituted ‘actual occupation’, but explicitly chose not to offer any comment as to whether the exercise of other forms of easeme
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.