BuboFlash - helps with learning

Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.

Presentation
Question

Answer

Tags

#land #law #proprietary-estoppel

Question

In [ case ], the Court of Appeal used this wide discretion when the claimant argued for an award based on his expectation. The respondents argued that ‘expectation’ should only be the starting point for an award. In response to these arguments the Court of Appeal steered a middle course:

“In such a case the court's natural response is to fulfil the claimant's expectations. But if the claimant's expectations are uncertain, or extravagant, or out of all proportion to the detriment which the claimant has suffered the court can and should recognise that the claimant's equity should be satisfied in another (and generally more limited) way.” Walker LJ (para.50)

Answer

Jennings v Rice [2002] EWCA Civ 159

Tags

#land #law #proprietary-estoppel

Question

In [ case ], the Court of Appeal used this wide discretion when the claimant argued for an award based on his expectation. The respondents argued that ‘expectation’ should only be the starting point for an award. In response to these arguments the Court of Appeal steered a middle course:

“In such a case the court's natural response is to fulfil the claimant's expectations. But if the claimant's expectations are uncertain, or extravagant, or out of all proportion to the detriment which the claimant has suffered the court can and should recognise that the claimant's equity should be satisfied in another (and generally more limited) way.” Walker LJ (para.50)

Answer

?

Tags

#land #law #proprietary-estoppel

Question

In [ case ], the Court of Appeal used this wide discretion when the claimant argued for an award based on his expectation. The respondents argued that ‘expectation’ should only be the starting point for an award. In response to these arguments the Court of Appeal steered a middle course:

“In such a case the court's natural response is to fulfil the claimant's expectations. But if the claimant's expectations are uncertain, or extravagant, or out of all proportion to the detriment which the claimant has suffered the court can and should recognise that the claimant's equity should be satisfied in another (and generally more limited) way.” Walker LJ (para.50)

Answer

Jennings v Rice [2002] EWCA Civ 159

If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"

Parent (intermediate) annotation

Open it
In Jennings v Rice [2002] EWCA Civ 159, the Court of Appeal used this wide discretion when the claimant argued for an award based on his expectation. The respondents argued that ‘expectation’ should only be the starting poin

Original toplevel document (pdf)

cannot see any pdfs

Summary

status	not learned		measured difficulty	37% [default]		last interval [days]
repetition number in this series	0		memorised on			scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval			last repetition or drill

Details

No repetitions

Discussion

Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.