Unconscionability is insufficient by itself (per Edward Nugee QC in [ case ]), but where the other three elements (assurance, reliance and detriment) are found, it is highly likely that the court will find that the landowner acted unconscionably in relying on his strict legal rights.
Answer
Re Basham (deceased) [1986] 1 WLR 1498
Tags
#land #law #proprietary-estoppel
Question
Unconscionability is insufficient by itself (per Edward Nugee QC in [ case ]), but where the other three elements (assurance, reliance and detriment) are found, it is highly likely that the court will find that the landowner acted unconscionably in relying on his strict legal rights.
Answer
?
Tags
#land #law #proprietary-estoppel
Question
Unconscionability is insufficient by itself (per Edward Nugee QC in [ case ]), but where the other three elements (assurance, reliance and detriment) are found, it is highly likely that the court will find that the landowner acted unconscionably in relying on his strict legal rights.
Answer
Re Basham (deceased) [1986] 1 WLR 1498
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it Unconscionability is insufficient by itself (per Edward Nugee QC in Re Basham (deceased) [1986] 1 WLR 1498), but where the other three elements (assurance, reliance and detriment) are found, it is highly likely that the court will find that the landowner acted unconscionably in relying on
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.