Despite Oliver J adding the element of unconscionability and suggesting a broader approach, this area of law is not simply a discretionary remedy. Lord Walker in [ case ]said that estoppel is ‘emphatically not a licence for abandoning careful analysis for unprincipled and subjective judicial opinion’
Answer
Cobbe v Yeoman’s Row Management Ltd [2008] UKHL 55
Tags
#land #law #proprietary-estoppel
Question
Despite Oliver J adding the element of unconscionability and suggesting a broader approach, this area of law is not simply a discretionary remedy. Lord Walker in [ case ]said that estoppel is ‘emphatically not a licence for abandoning careful analysis for unprincipled and subjective judicial opinion’
Answer
?
Tags
#land #law #proprietary-estoppel
Question
Despite Oliver J adding the element of unconscionability and suggesting a broader approach, this area of law is not simply a discretionary remedy. Lord Walker in [ case ]said that estoppel is ‘emphatically not a licence for abandoning careful analysis for unprincipled and subjective judicial opinion’
Answer
Cobbe v Yeoman’s Row Management Ltd [2008] UKHL 55
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it Despite Oliver J adding the element of unconscionability and suggesting a broader approach, this area of law is not simply a discretionary remedy. Lord Walker in Cobbe v Yeoman’s Row Management Ltd [2008] UKHL 55 said that estoppel is ‘emphatically not a licence for abandoning careful analysis for unprincipled and subjective judicial opinion’
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.