Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.



Tags
#land #law #proprietary-estoppel
Question
In [ case ], the claimant, Mrs Williams, was the landowner’s daughter. She had lived with her mother for most of her life, and spent her own money on repairs and improvements in the belief that she would be able to live in the property for the rest of her life. When the mother died, she left the property in her will to Mrs Griffiths. The court said that the claimant’s payment of basic outgoings did not give rise to any estoppel, as it could be said that the payments were made in return for being able to live in the property.
Answer
Griffiths v Williams (1977) 248 EG 947

Tags
#land #law #proprietary-estoppel
Question
In [ case ], the claimant, Mrs Williams, was the landowner’s daughter. She had lived with her mother for most of her life, and spent her own money on repairs and improvements in the belief that she would be able to live in the property for the rest of her life. When the mother died, she left the property in her will to Mrs Griffiths. The court said that the claimant’s payment of basic outgoings did not give rise to any estoppel, as it could be said that the payments were made in return for being able to live in the property.
Answer
?

Tags
#land #law #proprietary-estoppel
Question
In [ case ], the claimant, Mrs Williams, was the landowner’s daughter. She had lived with her mother for most of her life, and spent her own money on repairs and improvements in the belief that she would be able to live in the property for the rest of her life. When the mother died, she left the property in her will to Mrs Griffiths. The court said that the claimant’s payment of basic outgoings did not give rise to any estoppel, as it could be said that the payments were made in return for being able to live in the property.
Answer
Griffiths v Williams (1977) 248 EG 947
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"

Parent (intermediate) annotation

Open it
In Griffiths v Williams (1977) 248 EG 947, the claimant, Mrs Williams, was the landowner’s daughter. She had lived with her mother for most of her life, and spent her own money on repairs and improvements in the belief that s

Original toplevel document (pdf)

cannot see any pdfs

Summary

statusnot learnedmeasured difficulty37% [default]last interval [days]               
repetition number in this series0memorised on               scheduled repetition               
scheduled repetition interval               last repetition or drill

Details

No repetitions


Discussion

Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.