Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.



Tags
#land #law #proprietary-estoppel
Question
The classic exposition of the modern law was set out in [ case ] at 170 by Lord Kingsdown, and subsequently in Wilmott v Barber (1880) 15 Ch D 96 at 105- 6 by Fry J. The requirements set out in those cases, known as ‘the probanda’, were strict and can be summarised as follows:
  1. The Claimant (C) must have made a mistake as to his rights over the owner’s (O) land.
  2. C must have spent money or done some act because of the mistake.
  3. O must be aware of his own rights.
  4. O must also be aware of C’s mistake.
  5. O must have encouraged C, either directly or indirectly, by not asserting his own rights.
Answer
Ramsden v Dyson (1866) LR1HL 129

Tags
#land #law #proprietary-estoppel
Question
The classic exposition of the modern law was set out in [ case ] at 170 by Lord Kingsdown, and subsequently in Wilmott v Barber (1880) 15 Ch D 96 at 105- 6 by Fry J. The requirements set out in those cases, known as ‘the probanda’, were strict and can be summarised as follows:
  1. The Claimant (C) must have made a mistake as to his rights over the owner’s (O) land.
  2. C must have spent money or done some act because of the mistake.
  3. O must be aware of his own rights.
  4. O must also be aware of C’s mistake.
  5. O must have encouraged C, either directly or indirectly, by not asserting his own rights.
Answer
?

Tags
#land #law #proprietary-estoppel
Question
The classic exposition of the modern law was set out in [ case ] at 170 by Lord Kingsdown, and subsequently in Wilmott v Barber (1880) 15 Ch D 96 at 105- 6 by Fry J. The requirements set out in those cases, known as ‘the probanda’, were strict and can be summarised as follows:
  1. The Claimant (C) must have made a mistake as to his rights over the owner’s (O) land.
  2. C must have spent money or done some act because of the mistake.
  3. O must be aware of his own rights.
  4. O must also be aware of C’s mistake.
  5. O must have encouraged C, either directly or indirectly, by not asserting his own rights.
Answer
Ramsden v Dyson (1866) LR1HL 129
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"

Parent (intermediate) annotation

Open it
The classic exposition of the modern law was set out in Ramsden v Dyson (1866) LR1HL 129 at 170 by Lord Kingsdown, and subsequently in Wilmott v Barber (1880) 15 Ch D 96 at 105- 6 by Fry J. The requirements set out in those cases, known as ‘the probanda’, were strict and can

Original toplevel document (pdf)

cannot see any pdfs

Summary

statusnot learnedmeasured difficulty37% [default]last interval [days]               
repetition number in this series0memorised on               scheduled repetition               
scheduled repetition interval               last repetition or drill

Details

No repetitions


Discussion

Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.