However, in [ case ], on similar facts to Re Draper’s Conveyance, it was held that the divorce petition, which made no immediate claim, but prayed (sought) for a property adjustment order to be made in the future, was not enough to sever the joint tenancy. This was because a divorce petition alone was held not to convey a sufficient desire to sever immediately.
Answer
Harris v Goddard [1983] 1 WLR 1203
Tags
#co-ownership #land #law
Question
However, in [ case ], on similar facts to Re Draper’s Conveyance, it was held that the divorce petition, which made no immediate claim, but prayed (sought) for a property adjustment order to be made in the future, was not enough to sever the joint tenancy. This was because a divorce petition alone was held not to convey a sufficient desire to sever immediately.
Answer
?
Tags
#co-ownership #land #law
Question
However, in [ case ], on similar facts to Re Draper’s Conveyance, it was held that the divorce petition, which made no immediate claim, but prayed (sought) for a property adjustment order to be made in the future, was not enough to sever the joint tenancy. This was because a divorce petition alone was held not to convey a sufficient desire to sever immediately.
Answer
Harris v Goddard [1983] 1 WLR 1203
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it However, in Harris v Goddard [1983] 1 WLR 1203, on similar facts to Re Draper’s Conveyance, it was held that the divorce petition, which made no immediate claim, but prayed (sought) for a property adjustment order to be made in th
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.