Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.



Tags
#estates #freehold-covenant #land #law
Question
The liability is, therefore, conditional and if the successor is happy to do without the benefit, he cannot be made to submit to the burden. However, there will often be no real choice. If the successor has no option but to take the benefit (for example, in the case of [ case ] where the successor had no choice regarding a right of support) then the usual common law rule applies and the burden will not pass.
Answer
Rhone v Stephens [1994] 2 AC 310

Tags
#estates #freehold-covenant #land #law
Question
The liability is, therefore, conditional and if the successor is happy to do without the benefit, he cannot be made to submit to the burden. However, there will often be no real choice. If the successor has no option but to take the benefit (for example, in the case of [ case ] where the successor had no choice regarding a right of support) then the usual common law rule applies and the burden will not pass.
Answer
?

Tags
#estates #freehold-covenant #land #law
Question
The liability is, therefore, conditional and if the successor is happy to do without the benefit, he cannot be made to submit to the burden. However, there will often be no real choice. If the successor has no option but to take the benefit (for example, in the case of [ case ] where the successor had no choice regarding a right of support) then the usual common law rule applies and the burden will not pass.
Answer
Rhone v Stephens [1994] 2 AC 310
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"

Parent (intermediate) annotation

Open it
and if the successor is happy to do without the benefit, he cannot be made to submit to the burden. However, there will often be no real choice. If the successor has no option but to take the benefit (for example, in the case of <span>Rhone v Stephens [1994] 2 AC 310 where the successor had no choice regarding a right of support) then the usual common law rule applies and the burden will not pass.<span><body><html>

Original toplevel document (pdf)

cannot see any pdfs

Summary

statusnot learnedmeasured difficulty37% [default]last interval [days]               
repetition number in this series0memorised on               scheduled repetition               
scheduled repetition interval               last repetition or drill

Details

No repetitions


Discussion

Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.