Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.



Tags
#estates #freehold-covenant #land #law
Question
These fears were allayed by the decision in Roake v Chadha [1984] 1 WLR 40, which held that the effect of [ statute ] could be expressly excluded (even though s 78 (unlike s 79) is expressed in absolute terms and not subject to a contrary intention).
Answer
LPA 1925, s 78(1)

Tags
#estates #freehold-covenant #land #law
Question
These fears were allayed by the decision in Roake v Chadha [1984] 1 WLR 40, which held that the effect of [ statute ] could be expressly excluded (even though s 78 (unlike s 79) is expressed in absolute terms and not subject to a contrary intention).
Answer
?

Tags
#estates #freehold-covenant #land #law
Question
These fears were allayed by the decision in Roake v Chadha [1984] 1 WLR 40, which held that the effect of [ statute ] could be expressly excluded (even though s 78 (unlike s 79) is expressed in absolute terms and not subject to a contrary intention).
Answer
LPA 1925, s 78(1)
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"

Parent (intermediate) annotation

Open it
These fears were allayed by the decision in Roake v Chadha [1984] 1 WLR 40, which held that the effect of LPA 1925, s 78(1) could be expressly excluded (even though s 78 (unlike s 79) is expressed in absolute terms and not subject to a contrary intention).

Original toplevel document (pdf)

cannot see any pdfs

Summary

statusnot learnedmeasured difficulty37% [default]last interval [days]               
repetition number in this series0memorised on               scheduled repetition               
scheduled repetition interval               last repetition or drill

Details

No repetitions


Discussion

Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.