If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it These fears were allayed by the decision in Roake v Chadha [1984] 1 WLR 40, which held that the effect of LPA 1925, s 78(1) could be expressly excluded (even though s 78 (unlike s 79) is expressed in absolute terms and not subject to a contrary intention).
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.