The redescription of his histories as problematizations and their linkage with differential or spatialized thought emphasizes this fact: The freeing of difference requires thought without contradiction, without dialectics, without negation; thought that accepts divergence; affirmative thought whose instrument is disjunction; thought of the multiple – of the nomadic and dispersed multiplicity that is not limited or confined by the constraints of similarity. ...What is the answer to the question? The prob- lem. How is the problem resolved? By displacing the question. ...We must think problematically rather than question and answer dialectically. (LCP, 185–186