Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.

imagination has the freedom to create with schema - without schematizing. can i read this way? doesnt the translatir recommend reading the book this way???
is enigmatic origin of the work as a structure and indissociable unity—and as an object for structuralist criticism—is, according to Kant, “the first thing to which we must pay attention.” 17 According to Rousset also. From his first page on, he links “the nature of the literary fact,” always insuffi- ciently examined, to the “role in art of imagination, that fundamental activity” about which “uncertainties and oppositions abound.” This notion of an imagination that produces metaphor—that is, everything in language except the verb to be—remains for critics what certain philo- sophers today call a naively utilized operative concept. To surmount this technical ingenuousness is to reflect the operative concept as a thematic concept. This seems to be one of Rousset’s projects. To grasp the operation of creative imaginat
If you want to change selection, open document below and click on "Move attachment"


owner: agwilson27 - (no access) - Writing_and_Difference__Routledge_Classics_.pdf, p32


statusnot read reprioritisations
last reprioritisation on suggested re-reading day
started reading on finished reading on



Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.