But to say further that this union—which, moreover author- izesevery metaphor of elevation—is difference itself, Corneille’s own idiom— is this to say much? And if this were the essential aspect of “Corneillean movement,” where would Corneille be? Why is there more beauty in Polyeucte than in “an ascending movement of two rings
If you want to change selection, open document below and click on "Move attachment"
pdf
owner:
agwilson27 - (no access) - Writing_and_Difference__Routledge_Classics_.pdf, p48
Summary
| status | not read | | reprioritisations | |
|---|
| last reprioritisation on | | | suggested re-reading day | |
|---|
| started reading on | | | finished reading on | |
|---|
Details