Proust’s aesthetic is defined at the beginning of the essay on Claudel. And the affinities are evident, above and beyond all the differences. These affinities are assembled in the theme of “structural monotony”: “ ‘And thinking once more about the mon- otony of Vinteuil’s works, I explained to Albertine that great writers have created only a single work, or rather have refracted the same beauty that they bring to the world through diverse elements’” (p. 171). Claudel: “ ‘Le soulier de satin is Tête d’or in another form. It summarizes both Tête d’or and Partage de midi. It is even the conclusion of Partage de midi . . . ’ ” “ ‘A poet does hardly anything but develop a preestablished plan’” (p. 172
If you want to change selection, open document below and click on "Move attachment"
pdf
owner:
agwilson27 - (no access) - Writing_and_Difference__Routledge_Classics_.pdf, p52
Summary
status | not read | | reprioritisations | |
---|
last reprioritisation on | | | suggested re-reading day | |
---|
started reading on | | | finished reading on | |
---|
Details