Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.



Put differently, why is Derrida’s essay so docile in the face of Paul’s texts, even if this docility functions in the service of criticizing Paulinism as a discourse of (both) veiling and unveiling which—precisely —must be eluded as part the old epoch of “truth as onto-logical revelation” (83)? Derrida’s is here the same laziness or dogmatism we noted in Althusser’s text, a laziness or dogmatism—we should never forget—which is simply the obverse of the (initially) self- protective gesture of Breton as ecclesiastical gatekeeper of Paulinism
If you want to change selection, open document below and click on "Move attachment"

pdf

cannot see any pdfs


Summary

statusnot read reprioritisations
last reprioritisation on suggested re-reading day
started reading on finished reading on

Details



Discussion

Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.