The binomial pricing model uses a "discrete-time framework" to trace the evolution of the option's key underlying variable via a binomial lattice (tree), for a given number of time steps between valuation date and option expiration. Each node in the lattice represents a possible price of the underlying at a particular point in time. This price evolution forms the basis for the option valuation. The valuation process is iterative, starting at each final node, and then working backwards through the tree to the first node (valuation date), where the calculated result is the value of the option.
Option valuation using this method is, as described, a three step process:
We start off by having one binomial period for a European call option.
Define:
Formulas:
We assume that the stock price will only take two possible values at the expiration date of the option. In our example:
Step 1: Diagram Stock Price Dynamics and Option Values on Trees
Based on this information, tree diagrams for the stock value and call option payoffs (state dependent) would be drawn as follows:
Step 2: Compute Risk Neutral Probabilities of Up and Down States
μ = (90/80) = 1.125
Step 3: Compute Expected Value of Call Option
c0 = [0.4912 $5 + (1 - 0.4912) $0] / (1.06)0.5 = $2.385
Therefore, today's value of the 1-period option is $2.385.
Alternatively, we can use combination of Stocks and Calls to create state-independent payoffs and then determine the no-arbitrage value of the option rights.
Step 1: Calculate the hedge ratio (shares per call)
n = ($5 - $0) / ($90 - $75) = 0.3333
Step 2: Use the hedge ratio to construct a portfolio of stocks and calls in which terminal payoff is state-independent. Let TV denote the terminal value of the portfolio at expiration.
Regardless of which way the underlying moves, the portfolio value should be the same (perfectly hedged).
Continuing from the previous example:
To form a perfectly hedged portfolio, an investor needs to buy 1/3 of a share of stock for each call that is written (sold), or buy 1 share of stock and sell (write) 3 calls. To see that this is true, consider the position of the portfolio at the expiration of the call if the investor writes 1 call.
Note that each call is worth $5 to the buyer or holder, so the seller of the call is in a negative position.
Step 3: Value the Option
Guaranteed outcome is $25 for this portfolio, regardless of the value of the stock at expiration. How much should you pay for this risk-free position?
The present value of the guaranteed $25 to be received in six months is: $25 / 1.060.5 = $24.28. To guarantee the $25 outcome, the investor would have to buy 1/3 share of the stock and sell 1 call option.
This is the same value we ended up with using the direct approach.
Suppose the option of the previous example is selling for $3 - a clear case of price not equaling value. Investors would exploit this opportunity by selling the option and buying the underlying. The number of units of the underlying purchased for each option sold would be the hedge ratio: n = (c+ - c-) / (S+ - S-) = 0.3333. Suppose we sell 300 calls and buy 100 shares. The initial outlay would be 100 x $80 - 300 x $3 = $7100. Six months later, the portfolio value will be:
Our six-month return is 7500/7100 - 1 = 5.63%, and the annualized return is (1.0563)2 - 1 = 11.58%. This risk-free return is much higher than the actual risk-free return of 6%.
If the option sells for less than $2.38, an investor would buy the option and sell short the underlying, which would generate cash upfront. At expiration, the investor would have to pay back an amount less than 7%. All investors would perform this transaction, generating a demand for the option that would push its price back to $2.38.
Therefore, when the option is trading at the price given by the model, a hedge portfolio would earn the risk-free rate.
If the option is a put, please note the following differences:
status | not read | reprioritisations | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
last reprioritisation on | suggested re-reading day | |||
started reading on | finished reading on |