Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.



Tags
#cfa #cfa-level-1 #economics #microeconomics #reading-14-demand-and-supply-analysis-consumer-demand #section-4-the-opportunity-set #study-session-4
Question

Assuming a one-period model Warren has no reason not to spend all of his income so the weak inequality becomes a strict equality, as shown in Equation 4, because there would be no reason for Warren to save any of his income if there is “no tomorrow.”

Equation (4) 

[...]
Answer
PBQB + PWQW = I

Tags
#cfa #cfa-level-1 #economics #microeconomics #reading-14-demand-and-supply-analysis-consumer-demand #section-4-the-opportunity-set #study-session-4
Question

Assuming a one-period model Warren has no reason not to spend all of his income so the weak inequality becomes a strict equality, as shown in Equation 4, because there would be no reason for Warren to save any of his income if there is “no tomorrow.”

Equation (4) 

[...]
Answer
?

Tags
#cfa #cfa-level-1 #economics #microeconomics #reading-14-demand-and-supply-analysis-consumer-demand #section-4-the-opportunity-set #study-session-4
Question

Assuming a one-period model Warren has no reason not to spend all of his income so the weak inequality becomes a strict equality, as shown in Equation 4, because there would be no reason for Warren to save any of his income if there is “no tomorrow.”

Equation (4) 

[...]
Answer
PBQB + PWQW = I
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"

Parent (intermediate) annotation

Open it
not to spend all of his income so the weak inequality becomes a strict equality, as shown in Equation 4, because there would be no reason for Warren to save any of his income if there is “no tomorrow.” Equation (4)  <span>P B Q B + P W Q W = I <span><body><html>

Original toplevel document

4. THE OPPORTUNITY SET: CONSUMPTION, PRODUCTION, AND INVESTMENT CHOICE
the expenditure on wine does not exceed his income per time period. We can represent this income constraint (or budget constraint ) with the following expression: Equation (3)  P B Q B + P W Q W ≤ I <span>This expression simply constrains Warren to spend, in total, no more than his income. At this stage of our analysis, we are assuming a one-period model. In effect, then, Warren has no reason not to spend all of his income. The weak inequality becomes a strict equality, as shown in Equation 4, because there would be no reason for Warren to save any of his income if there is “no tomorrow.” Equation (4)  P B Q B + P W Q W = I From this equation, we see that if Warren were to spend all of his income only on bread, he could buy I/P B slices of bread. Or if he were to confine his expenditure to wi

Summary

statusnot learnedmeasured difficulty37% [default]last interval [days]               
repetition number in this series0memorised on               scheduled repetition               
scheduled repetition interval               last repetition or drill

Details

No repetitions


Discussion

Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.