minimum information principle cannot be understood as [...] in your collections or even items
Answer
minimum number of characters or bits
Tags
#rules-of-formulating-knowledge
Question
minimum information principle cannot be understood as [...] in your collections or even items
Answer
?
Tags
#rules-of-formulating-knowledge
Question
minimum information principle cannot be understood as [...] in your collections or even items
Answer
minimum number of characters or bits
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it minimum information principle cannot be understood as minimum number of characters or bits in your collections or even items
Original toplevel document
17. Redundancy does not contradict minimum information principle r duplicate information, etc. Redundancy does not have to contradict the minimum information principle and may even be welcome. The problem of redundancy is too wide for this short text. Here are some examples that are only to illustrate that <span>minimum information principle cannot be understood as minimum number of characters or bits in your collections or even items:
passive and active approach : if you learn a foreign language, e.g. Esperanto, you will often build word pairs such as phone-telefono, language-lingvo, hope-esperanto, etc
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.