Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.



requirement of majority rule then provides no clear winner.
If you want to change selection, open document below and click on "Move attachment"

Voting paradox - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
n be argued that B should win instead, since two voters (1 and 2) prefer B to C and only one voter (3) prefers C to B. However, by the same argument A is preferred to B, and C is preferred to A, by a margin of two to one on each occasion. The <span>requirement of majority rule then provides no clear winner. Also, if an election were held with the above three voters as the only participants, nobody would win under majority rule, as it would result in a three way tie with each candidate getti


Summary

statusnot read reprioritisations
last reprioritisation on suggested re-reading day
started reading on finished reading on

Details


Discussion

Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.