Tags
#conditional-doxastic-models #doxastic-logic #logic-of-conditional-beliefs #private-announcements #public-announcements #serious-possibility-paradox-project
Question
How is expansion T + P defined in semantic terms in a BKL AGM model?
Answer
Expansion T + P of a semantic theory T ⊆ S with a semantic proposition P ⊆ S is given b y the intersection T ∩ P
Tags
#conditional-doxastic-models #doxastic-logic #logic-of-conditional-beliefs #private-announcements #public-announcements #serious-possibility-paradox-project
Question
How is expansion T + P defined in semantic terms in a BKL AGM model?
Tags
#conditional-doxastic-models #doxastic-logic #logic-of-conditional-beliefs #private-announcements #public-announcements #serious-possibility-paradox-project
Question
How is expansion T + P defined in semantic terms in a BKL AGM model?
Answer
Expansion T + P of a semantic theory T ⊆ S with a semantic proposition P ⊆ S is given b y the intersection T ∩ P
If you want to change selection, open document below and click on "Move attachment"
pdf
owner:
rappatoni - (no access) - Baltag and Smets - conditional doxastic models a qualiltative approach to odynamic belief revision.pdf, p6
Summary
| status | not learned | | measured difficulty | 37% [default] | | last interval [days] | |
|---|
| repetition number in this series | 0 | | memorised on | | | scheduled repetition | |
|---|
| scheduled repetition interval | | | last repetition or drill | | | | |
|---|
Details
No repetitions