our participants seemed to be of two minds: They dropped items they knew at the time, but they also seemed aware that they might forget those items by the time of the test. If they knew that they might forget those items, why not leave them in the deck for further study? Our hypothesis is that the participants believed, wrongly, that there was little to gain from restudying an answer once they could recall it, even if the answer might other- wise be forgotten
If you want to change selection, open document below and click on "Move attachment"
pdf
owner:
jeanmarc.rizk - (no access) - Kornell, Bjork - 2007 - The Promise and Perils of self-regulated study.pdf, p3
Summary
| status | not read | | reprioritisations | |
|---|
| last reprioritisation on | | | suggested re-reading day | |
|---|
| started reading on | | | finished reading on | |
|---|
Details