Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.

Therefore, Orientalism is not a mere political subject matter or field is reflected passively by culture, scholarship, or institu- tions; nor is it a large and diffuse collection of texts about the Orient; nor is it representative and expressive of some nefarious "Western" imperialist plot to hold down the "Oriental" world. It is rather a §!!1£Yli!2!Lci. .,gi:opolitic~l .• aw_a!!;.~ess into __ ,..aesthetic, 1'£hO~!'!~J~£...~OQ1_~.,_J\q9_l9l(lgic,<1:!1~ with various k~~aped tq_a_E_~ree by the exchange with p~litical (as with a colonial or im£!rial establishm~t), power intell~tl!al (as with reigning sciences like comparative linguisticso'r anatomy, or any of the modem Ii sciences), ower !!Jura as with ort ox1es an canons of taste texts. yalues2_, PQWer moral (as with ideas about what "we" do and what "they" -~do or understand as "we" do)_ Indeed, my real argument is that Orientalism is-and does not simply represent-a con- siderable dimension of modem political-intellectual culture, and as such has less to do with the Orient than it does with "our" wodd.
If you want to change selection, open document below and click on "Move attachment"


owner: logan - (no access) - Said, Edward W.: Orientalism, p12


statusnot read reprioritisations
last reprioritisation on suggested re-reading day
started reading on finished reading on



Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.