Question
the non-standard notation [...] used in the first edition to the standard notation f (P) and f −1 (Q), respectively. Whereas the author still finds the notation used in the first edition superior in terms of avoiding confusion with inverse functions, he has deferred to requests from colleagues and reviewers to switch to the standard notation
f ∗ (P) and f (Q)

Question
the non-standard notation [...] used in the first edition to the standard notation f (P) and f −1 (Q), respectively. Whereas the author still finds the notation used in the first edition superior in terms of avoiding confusion with inverse functions, he has deferred to requests from colleagues and reviewers to switch to the standard notation
?

Question
the non-standard notation [...] used in the first edition to the standard notation f (P) and f −1 (Q), respectively. Whereas the author still finds the notation used in the first edition superior in terms of avoiding confusion with inverse functions, he has deferred to requests from colleagues and reviewers to switch to the standard notation
f ∗ (P) and f (Q)
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"

#### Parent (intermediate) annotation

Open it
the non-standard notation f ∗ (P) and f ∗ (Q) used in the first edition to the standard notation f (P) and f −1 (Q), respectively. Whereas the author still finds the notation used in the first edition superior in terms of avoidin

#### Original toplevel document (pdf)

owner: gabrielqv - (no access) - Proofs_and_Fundamentals.pdf, p13

#### Summary

status measured difficulty not learned 37% [default] 0

No repetitions