the non-standard notation f ∗ (P) and f ∗ (Q) used in the first edition to the standard notation [...] respectively. Whereas the author still finds the notation used in the first edition superior in terms of avoiding confusion with inverse functions, he has deferred to requests from colleagues and reviewers to switch to the standard notation
Answer
f (P) and f −1 (Q),
Question
the non-standard notation f ∗ (P) and f ∗ (Q) used in the first edition to the standard notation [...] respectively. Whereas the author still finds the notation used in the first edition superior in terms of avoiding confusion with inverse functions, he has deferred to requests from colleagues and reviewers to switch to the standard notation
Answer
?
Question
the non-standard notation f ∗ (P) and f ∗ (Q) used in the first edition to the standard notation [...] respectively. Whereas the author still finds the notation used in the first edition superior in terms of avoiding confusion with inverse functions, he has deferred to requests from colleagues and reviewers to switch to the standard notation
Answer
f (P) and f −1 (Q),
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it the non-standard notation f ∗ (P) and f ∗ (Q) used in the first edition to the standard notation f (P) and f −1 (Q), respectively. Whereas the author still finds the notation used in the first edition superior in terms of avoiding confusion with inverse functions, he has deferred to requests from coll
Original toplevel document (pdf)
owner: gabrielqv - (no access) - Proofs_and_Fundamentals.pdf, p13
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.