for ggplot2 in R, non-numeric or categorical variables should be coded as factor variables and have meaningful labels for each level of the factor. If a variable represents temperature categories, it might be better to use “cold”, “mild”, and “hot” rather than “ [...] ”, “ [...] ”, and “ [...] ”
Answer
for ggplot2 in R, non-numeric or categorical variables should be coded as factor variables and have meaningful labels for each level of the factor. If a variable represents temperature categories, it might be better to use “cold”, “mild”, and “hot” rather than “1”, “2”, and “3”
Question
for ggplot2 in R, non-numeric or categorical variables should be coded as factor variables and have meaningful labels for each level of the factor. If a variable represents temperature categories, it might be better to use “cold”, “mild”, and “hot” rather than “ [...] ”, “ [...] ”, and “ [...] ”
Answer
?
Question
for ggplot2 in R, non-numeric or categorical variables should be coded as factor variables and have meaningful labels for each level of the factor. If a variable represents temperature categories, it might be better to use “cold”, “mild”, and “hot” rather than “ [...] ”, “ [...] ”, and “ [...] ”
Answer
for ggplot2 in R, non-numeric or categorical variables should be coded as factor variables and have meaningful labels for each level of the factor. If a variable represents temperature categories, it might be better to use “cold”, “mild”, and “hot” rather than “1”, “2”, and “3”
If you want to change selection, open document below and click on "Move attachment"
pdf
owner: aelizzybeth - (no access) - Exploratory_Data_Analysis_with_R_Peng.pdf, p151
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.