nitriding is the appropriate choice (vs nitrocarburizing,salt bath,tufftride)
Answer
For lightly loaded, precision components where distortion can be a major consideration, nitriding is the appropriate choice. A functional case depth up to 0.030 – 0.035″ can be economically achieved. Depending on the material, a surface hardness in excess of HRC 65 is not out of reach
Tags
#material #material_HeatTreatETC
Question
nitriding is the appropriate choice (vs nitrocarburizing,salt bath,tufftride)
Answer
?
Tags
#material #material_HeatTreatETC
Question
nitriding is the appropriate choice (vs nitrocarburizing,salt bath,tufftride)
Answer
For lightly loaded, precision components where distortion can be a major consideration, nitriding is the appropriate choice. A functional case depth up to 0.030 – 0.035″ can be economically achieved. Depending on the material, a surface hardness in excess of HRC 65 is not out of reach
If you want to change selection, open document below and click on "Move attachment"
Nitriding and Carburizing | Metlab Heat Treat y? In general, the application dictates whether nitriding or carburizing should be the process of choice. For lightly loaded, precision components where distortion can be a major consideration, <span>nitriding is the appropriate choice. A functional case depth up to 0.030 – 0.035″ can be economically achieved. Depending on the material, a surface hardness in excess of HRC 65 is not out of reach. Applications such as g
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.