ual isomorphisms. And even in category theory, often we do not have to distinguish two categories as long as they are equivalent. These are only three exa mples for the fairly common situation that we start with a pair (C, W ) consisting of a category C and a class W of so-called weak equivalences, a class of morphisms which we would like to treat as isomorphisms. In such situations, functorial constructions are only ‘meaningful’ if they preserve weak equivalences. The search for convenient languag es to study such situatio ns has already quite some his tory and various different approaches have been cons id- ered. This includes triangulated categories, model categories, derivato
Question
[default - edit me]
Answer
?
Question
[default - edit me]
Answer
ual isomorphisms. And even in category theory, often we do not have to distinguish two categories as long as they are equivalent. These are only three exa mples for the fairly common situation that we start with a pair (C, W ) consisting of a category C and a class W of so-called weak equivalences, a class of morphisms which we would like to treat as isomorphisms. In such situations, functorial constructions are only ‘meaningful’ if they preserve weak equivalences. The search for convenient languag es to study such situatio ns has already quite some his tory and various different approaches have been cons id- ered. This includes triangulated categories, model categories, derivato
If you want to change selection, open document below and click on "Move attachment"
pdf
owner: testinfinitycategories - (no access) - 0 - A Short Course on Infinity Categories - Groth.pdf, p2
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.