#causality #statistics
It might seem like consistency is obviously true, but that is not always the case. For example, if the treatment specification is simply “get a dog” or “don’t get a dog,” this can be too coarse to yield consistency. It might be that if I were to get a puppy, I would observe 𝑌 = 1 (happiness) because I needed an energetic friend, but if I were to get an old, low-energy dog, I would observe 𝑌 = 0 (unhappiness). However, both of these treatments fall under the category of “get a dog,” so both correspond to 𝑇 = 1 . This means that 𝑌(1) is not well defined, since it will be 1 or 0, depending on something that is not captured by the treatment specification. In this sense, consistency encompasses the assumption that is sometimes referred to as “no multiple versions of treatment.”
If you want to change selection, open document below and click on "Move attachment"
pdf
owner:
crocodile - (no access) - Introduction_to_Causal_Inference-Nov19_2020-Neal.pdf, p22
Summary
status | not read | | reprioritisations | |
---|
last reprioritisation on | | | suggested re-reading day | |
---|
started reading on | | | finished reading on | |
---|
Details