In 1896, evidence came to light—primarily through an investigation made by [...] , head of counter-espionage —which identified the real culprit as a French Army major named [...] .
In 1896, evidence came to light—primarily through an investigation made by [...] , head of counter-espionage —which identified the real culprit as a French Army major named [...] .
Answer
?
Question
In 1896, evidence came to light—primarily through an investigation made by [...] , head of counter-espionage —which identified the real culprit as a French Army major named [...] .
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it In 1896, evidence came to light—primarily through an investigation made by Georges Picquart , head of counter-espionage —which identified the real culprit as a French Army major named Ferdinand Walsin Esterhazy .
Original toplevel document
Dreyfus affair - Wikipedia sentenced to life imprisonment for communicating French military secrets to the German Embassy in Paris, and was imprisoned on Devil's Island in French Guiana, where he spent nearly five years. <span>In 1896, evidence came to light—primarily through an investigation made by Georges Picquart, head of counter-espionage—which identified the real culprit as a French Army major named Ferdinand Walsin Esterhazy. When high-ranking military officials suppressed the new evidence, a military court unanimously acquitted Esterhazy after a trial lasting only two days. The Army laid additional charges
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.