This then is the fundamental issue for present philosophy. Is the doctrine justified that knowledge is valid in the degree in which it is arevelation of antecedent existences or Being? Is the doctrine justified that regulative ends and purposes have validity only when they can be shown to be properties belong- ing to things, whether as existences or as essences, apart from human action?
If you want to change selection, open document below and click on "Move attachment"
pdf
owner:
caj2167 - (no access) - dewey_quest.pdf, p56
Summary
| status | not read | | reprioritisations | |
|---|
| last reprioritisation on | | | suggested re-reading day | |
|---|
| started reading on | | | finished reading on | |
|---|
Details