Most governments seem to regard the vulnerability of livelihoods to output reductions as inevitable, and conclude that any output reduction is a threat to livelihoods, and that the only way to secure livelihoods is to pursue economic growth.
- This would seem to correspond to statements I've heard politicians make over the decades, but can it be backed up?
| status | not read | reprioritisations | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| last reprioritisation on | suggested re-reading day | |||
| started reading on | finished reading on |