Edited, memorised or added to reading queue

on 09-Apr-2021 (Fri)

Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Click here to log in or create user.

was a tributary alliance between an Indian state and a European East India Company. The system of subsidiary alliances was pioneered by the French East India Company governor Joseph François Dupleix, who in the late 1740s established treaties with the Nizam of Hyderabad and other Indian princes in the Carnatic
statusnot read reprioritisations
last reprioritisation on suggested re-reading day
started reading on finished reading on

Subsidiary alliance - Wikipedia
e) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) A lithograph of Joseph François Dupleix, who pioneered the system of subsidiary alliances. A subsidiary alliance, in South Asian history, <span>was a tributary alliance between an Indian state and a European East India Company. The system of subsidiary alliances was pioneered by the French East India Company governor Joseph François Dupleix, who in the late 1740s established treaties with the Nizam of Hyderabad and other Indian princes in the Carnatic.[1] The method was subsequently adopted by the British East India Company, with Robert Clive negotiating a series of conditions with Mir Jafar following his victory in the 1757 Battle o




adopted by the British East India Company, with Robert Clive negotiating a series of conditions with Mir Jafar following his victory in the 1757 Battle of Plassey, and subsequently those in the 1765 Treaty of Allahabad, as a result of the Company's success in the 1764 Battle of Buxar.
statusnot read reprioritisations
last reprioritisation on suggested re-reading day
started reading on finished reading on

Subsidiary alliance - Wikipedia
t India Company governor Joseph François Dupleix, who in the late 1740s established treaties with the Nizam of Hyderabad and other Indian princes in the Carnatic.[1] The method was subsequently <span>adopted by the British East India Company, with Robert Clive negotiating a series of conditions with Mir Jafar following his victory in the 1757 Battle of Plassey, and subsequently those in the 1765 Treaty of Allahabad, as a result of the Company's success in the 1764 Battle of Buxar. A successor of Clive, Richard Wellesley initially took a non-interventionist policy towards the various Indian states which were allied to the British East India Company, but later adop




In a Subsidiary Alliance, princely rulers were forbidden from making any negotiations and treaty with any other Indian ruler without first making inquires to Company officials.
statusnot read reprioritisations
last reprioritisation on suggested re-reading day
started reading on finished reading on

Subsidiary alliance - Wikipedia
rnment, and which from the earliest period of Eastern history has rendered the peninsula of India the scene of perpetual warfare, turbulence and disorder... Richard Wellesley, 4th February 1804 <span>In a Subsidiary Alliance, princely rulers were forbidden from making any negotiations and treaty with any other Indian ruler without first making inquires to Company officials. They were also forbidden from maintaining any standing armies. They were instead to be protected by the troops of the European companies, paying for their upkeep.[1] By the late 18th ce




also forbidden from maintaining any standing armies
statusnot read reprioritisations
last reprioritisation on suggested re-reading day
started reading on finished reading on

Subsidiary alliance - Wikipedia
y 1804 In a Subsidiary Alliance, princely rulers were forbidden from making any negotiations and treaty with any other Indian ruler without first making inquires to Company officials. They were <span>also forbidden from maintaining any standing armies. They were instead to be protected by the troops of the European companies, paying for their upkeep.[1] By the late 18th century, the power of the Maratha Empire had weakened and the In




instead to be protected by the troops of the European companies, paying for their upkeep.
statusnot read reprioritisations
last reprioritisation on suggested re-reading day
started reading on finished reading on

Subsidiary alliance - Wikipedia
from making any negotiations and treaty with any other Indian ruler without first making inquires to Company officials. They were also forbidden from maintaining any standing armies. They were <span>instead to be protected by the troops of the European companies, paying for their upkeep.[1] By the late 18th century, the power of the Maratha Empire had weakened and the Indian subcontinent was left with a great number of states, most small and weak. Many rulers accepted t




Indian ruler entering into a subsidiary alliance with the British would accept British forces within his territory and to pay for their maintenance.
statusnot read reprioritisations
last reprioritisation on suggested re-reading day
started reading on finished reading on

Subsidiary alliance - Wikipedia
on by Wellesley, as it gave them security against attack by their neighbours.[1] Contents 1 Terms of subsidiary alliance 2 Adoption 3 See also 4 References Terms of subsidiary alliance[edit] An <span>Indian ruler entering into a subsidiary alliance with the British would accept British forces within his territory and to pay for their maintenance. The ruler would accept a British official (resident) in his state. The ruler who entered into a subsidiary alliance would not join any alliance with any other power or declare war again




would not join any alliance with any other power or declare war against any power without the permission of the British.
statusnot read reprioritisations
last reprioritisation on suggested re-reading day
started reading on finished reading on

Subsidiary alliance - Wikipedia
accept British forces within his territory and to pay for their maintenance. The ruler would accept a British official (resident) in his state. The ruler who entered into a subsidiary alliance <span>would not join any alliance with any other power or declare war against any power without the permission of the British. The ruler would dismiss any Europeans other than the British and avoid employing new ones. The ruler would let the British rule on any conflict with any other state. The ruler would ack




The ruler would accept a British official (resident) in his state.
statusnot read reprioritisations
last reprioritisation on suggested re-reading day
started reading on finished reading on

Subsidiary alliance - Wikipedia
rences Terms of subsidiary alliance[edit] An Indian ruler entering into a subsidiary alliance with the British would accept British forces within his territory and to pay for their maintenance. <span>The ruler would accept a British official (resident) in his state. The ruler who entered into a subsidiary alliance would not join any alliance with any other power or declare war against any power without the permission of the British. The ruler would




ruler would dismiss any Europeans other than the British and avoid employing new ones.
statusnot read reprioritisations
last reprioritisation on suggested re-reading day
started reading on finished reading on

Subsidiary alliance - Wikipedia
dent) in his state. The ruler who entered into a subsidiary alliance would not join any alliance with any other power or declare war against any power without the permission of the British. The <span>ruler would dismiss any Europeans other than the British and avoid employing new ones. The ruler would let the British rule on any conflict with any other state. The ruler would acknowledge the East India Company as the paramount power in India. The ruler would have his s




ruler would acknowledge the East India Company as the paramount power in India.
statusnot read reprioritisations
last reprioritisation on suggested re-reading day
started reading on finished reading on

Subsidiary alliance - Wikipedia
mission of the British. The ruler would dismiss any Europeans other than the British and avoid employing new ones. The ruler would let the British rule on any conflict with any other state. The <span>ruler would acknowledge the East India Company as the paramount power in India. The ruler would have his state be protected by the Company from external dangers and internal disorders. If the rulers failed to make the payments that were required by the alliance, pa




ruler would have his state be protected by the Company from external dangers and internal disorders.
statusnot read reprioritisations
last reprioritisation on suggested re-reading day
started reading on finished reading on

Subsidiary alliance - Wikipedia
and avoid employing new ones. The ruler would let the British rule on any conflict with any other state. The ruler would acknowledge the East India Company as the paramount power in India. The <span>ruler would have his state be protected by the Company from external dangers and internal disorders. If the rulers failed to make the payments that were required by the alliance, part of their territory would be taken away as punishment. Adoption[edit] Indian rulers under British prote




rulers failed to make the payments that were required by the alliance, part of their territory would be taken away as punishment.
statusnot read reprioritisations
last reprioritisation on suggested re-reading day
started reading on finished reading on

Subsidiary alliance - Wikipedia
e ruler would acknowledge the East India Company as the paramount power in India. The ruler would have his state be protected by the Company from external dangers and internal disorders. If the <span>rulers failed to make the payments that were required by the alliance, part of their territory would be taken away as punishment. Adoption[edit] Indian rulers under British protection surrendered the control of their foreign affairs to the British East India Company. Most subordinate disbanded their native armies




successor of Clive, Richard Wellesley initially took a non-interventionist policy towards the various Indian states which were allied to the British East India Company, but later adopted, and refined the policy
statusnot read reprioritisations
last reprioritisation on suggested re-reading day
started reading on finished reading on

Subsidiary alliance - Wikipedia
s with Mir Jafar following his victory in the 1757 Battle of Plassey, and subsequently those in the 1765 Treaty of Allahabad, as a result of the Company's success in the 1764 Battle of Buxar. A <span>successor of Clive, Richard Wellesley initially took a non-interventionist policy towards the various Indian states which were allied to the British East India Company, but later adopted, and refined the policy of forming subsidiary alliances. The purpose and ambition of this change are stated in his February 1804 dispatch to the East India Company Resident in Hyderabad:[2] His Excellency the




kingdom of Awadh was the first to enter an alliance like this through Treaty of Allahabad (1765), after its defeat in Battle of Buxar (1764)
statusnot read reprioritisations
last reprioritisation on suggested re-reading day
started reading on finished reading on

Subsidiary alliance - Wikipedia
d maintained British troops within their states to protect them from attack, but that became increasingly unlikely in most parts of India as British power was consolidated.[citation needed] The <span>kingdom of Awadh was the first to enter an alliance like this through Treaty of Allahabad (1765), after its defeat in Battle of Buxar (1764). Though annexation of Awadh was done on the basis of malgovernance and hence is not counted under the subsidiary alliances. Tipu Sultan of the Kingdom of Mysore refrained from doing so,




Though annexation of Awadh was done on the basis of malgovernance and hence is not counted under the subsidiary alliances
statusnot read reprioritisations
last reprioritisation on suggested re-reading day
started reading on finished reading on

Subsidiary alliance - Wikipedia
ritish power was consolidated.[citation needed] The kingdom of Awadh was the first to enter an alliance like this through Treaty of Allahabad (1765), after its defeat in Battle of Buxar (1764). <span>Though annexation of Awadh was done on the basis of malgovernance and hence is not counted under the subsidiary alliances. Tipu Sultan of the Kingdom of Mysore refrained from doing so, but after the British victory in the Fourth Anglo-Mysore War in 1799, Mysore became a subsidiary state before coming under




The Holkar State of Indore was the last Maratha confederation to accept the Subsidiary Alliance in 1818.[ citation needed ]
statusnot read reprioritisations
last reprioritisation on suggested re-reading day
started reading on finished reading on

Subsidiary alliance - Wikipedia
o accepted a subsidiary alliance.[citation needed] Other states Tanjore/Mysore (1799), Avadh (1801), Peshwa (1802), Bhonsle (1803), and Scindhiya (1804) accepted this alliance.[citation needed] <span>The Holkar State of Indore was the last Maratha confederation to accept the Subsidiary Alliance in 1818.[citation needed] See also[edit] Salute state Tributary state British protectorate Rajputana Agency Client state Indirect rule References[edit] ^ Jump up to: a b c Adrian Carton (6 August 2012). Mixed-Ra




Flashcard 6318983875852

Question
What is a gene mutation
Answer
[default - edit me]

statusnot learnedmeasured difficulty37% [default]last interval [days]               
repetition number in this series0memorised on               scheduled repetition               
scheduled repetition interval               last repetition or drill

pdf

cannot see any pdfs







What is a gene mutation -a change in the base sequence of DNA (on chromosome) -can arise spontaneously during DNA replication (interphase) -involves base deletion / substitution
statusnot read reprioritisations
last reprioritisation on suggested re-reading day
started reading on finished reading on

pdf

cannot see any pdfs