[case], where the Home Secretary sought to argue that she had a residual common law right using prerogative powers to amend the rules applying to immigration controls, in this case those that governed work permits for those in skilled occupations. The Supreme Court, led in this instance by Lord Hope, rejected this argument on the basis that ever since the Immigration Act 1971, matters pertaining to immigration control, previously governed by prerogative power, had been subject to statutory control alone. Any notable change in the relevant rules therefore had to be approved firstly by Parliament.
Answer
R (Alvi) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 33
Tags
#constitution #law #public
Question
[case], where the Home Secretary sought to argue that she had a residual common law right using prerogative powers to amend the rules applying to immigration controls, in this case those that governed work permits for those in skilled occupations. The Supreme Court, led in this instance by Lord Hope, rejected this argument on the basis that ever since the Immigration Act 1971, matters pertaining to immigration control, previously governed by prerogative power, had been subject to statutory control alone. Any notable change in the relevant rules therefore had to be approved firstly by Parliament.
Answer
?
Tags
#constitution #law #public
Question
[case], where the Home Secretary sought to argue that she had a residual common law right using prerogative powers to amend the rules applying to immigration controls, in this case those that governed work permits for those in skilled occupations. The Supreme Court, led in this instance by Lord Hope, rejected this argument on the basis that ever since the Immigration Act 1971, matters pertaining to immigration control, previously governed by prerogative power, had been subject to statutory control alone. Any notable change in the relevant rules therefore had to be approved firstly by Parliament.
Answer
R (Alvi) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 33
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it R (Alvi) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 33, where the Home Secretary sought to argue that she had a residual common law right using prerogative powers to amend the rules applying to immigration controls, in this case those tha
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.