Regulatory authorities are generally found to be exercising public functions. For example, the decisions of the Advertising Standards Authority (R v Advertising Standards Authority Ltd, ex parte Insurance Services plc (1989) 9 Tr LR 169) and the [case]have been reviewed by the courts. In both these cases, it was considered that, had there not been a self-regulatory authority in existence, Parliament would almost certainly have needed to intervene and regulate the activity in question.
Answer
Bar Council (R v Bar Council, ex parte Percival [1990] 3 All ER 137)
Tags
#jr #law #public
Question
Regulatory authorities are generally found to be exercising public functions. For example, the decisions of the Advertising Standards Authority (R v Advertising Standards Authority Ltd, ex parte Insurance Services plc (1989) 9 Tr LR 169) and the [case]have been reviewed by the courts. In both these cases, it was considered that, had there not been a self-regulatory authority in existence, Parliament would almost certainly have needed to intervene and regulate the activity in question.
Answer
?
Tags
#jr #law #public
Question
Regulatory authorities are generally found to be exercising public functions. For example, the decisions of the Advertising Standards Authority (R v Advertising Standards Authority Ltd, ex parte Insurance Services plc (1989) 9 Tr LR 169) and the [case]have been reviewed by the courts. In both these cases, it was considered that, had there not been a self-regulatory authority in existence, Parliament would almost certainly have needed to intervene and regulate the activity in question.
Answer
Bar Council (R v Bar Council, ex parte Percival [1990] 3 All ER 137)
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it atory authorities are generally found to be exercising public functions. For example, the decisions of the Advertising Standards Authority (R v Advertising Standards Authority Ltd, ex parte Insurance Services plc (1989) 9 Tr LR 169) and the <span>Bar Council (R v Bar Council, ex parte Percival [1990] 3 All ER 137) have been reviewed by the courts. In both these cases, it was considered that, had there not been a self-regulatory authority in existence, Parliament would almost certainly have neede
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.