The idea is that although the treatment and potential outcomes may be unconditionally associated (due to confounding), within levels of 𝑋 , they are not associated. In other words, there is no [...-ing?] within levels of 𝑋 because controlling for 𝑋 has made the treatment groups comparable.
Answer
confounding
Tags
#causality #statistics
Question
The idea is that although the treatment and potential outcomes may be unconditionally associated (due to confounding), within levels of 𝑋 , they are not associated. In other words, there is no [...-ing?] within levels of 𝑋 because controlling for 𝑋 has made the treatment groups comparable.
Answer
?
Tags
#causality #statistics
Question
The idea is that although the treatment and potential outcomes may be unconditionally associated (due to confounding), within levels of 𝑋 , they are not associated. In other words, there is no [...-ing?] within levels of 𝑋 because controlling for 𝑋 has made the treatment groups comparable.
Answer
confounding
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it an> The idea is that although the treatment and potential outcomes may be unconditionally associated (due to confounding), within levels of 𝑋 , they are not associated. In other words, there is <span>no confounding within levels of 𝑋 because controlling for 𝑋 has made the treatment groups comparable. <span>
Original toplevel document (pdf)
owner: crocodile - (no access) - Introduction_to_Causal_Inference-Nov19_2020-Neal.pdf, p18
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.